Summary
Brucellosis is a systemic zoonotic infection transmitted to humans by contact with the body fluids of infected animals or consumption of infected animal products. Although nearly eradicated in many developed countries, the disease is still endemic in Middle and South America, Central Asia, the Arabian Peninsula, Middle East, and Mediterranean regions. Any organ or system of the body may be involved. Skeletal system, spleen, liver, and bone marrow are the most frequently affected sites. Ocular involvement is reported relatively rarely, in 3.4%-26% of brucellosis cases, usually as a complication of chronic phases of the disease. Although ocular complications have been known since the early 20th century, decades after recognition of the disease, there is no convincing data about its true incidence, as most citations in the literature refer to case reports. Ocular brucellosis has severe complications and may result in total loss of vision in a quarter of patients despite appropriate treatment. A literature search conducted in PubMed on 10 September 2018 using the keywords "ocular-brucellosis" and "uveitis-brucellosis" and limiting to only human studies in the English literature published after 1950 yielded 27 and 29 articles, respectively. Of these, 14 were case reports or case series and included a total of 131 cases. We also found five case reports by searching for "oküler-brusella" and "göz-brusella", two in the Turkish Medline database (www.turkmedline.net) and four in Google search, with a total of six cases. Herein, we describe a case of ocular involvement of chronic brucellosis presenting with chorioretinitis that led to severe visual loss, and present a systematic review of previous cases reports and series in the literature. We believe that in an endemic area such as our country, routine ophthalmologic evaluation of all patients diagnosed with brucellosis and immediate initiation of therapy are necessary to prevent disease progression and severe sequelae.
Introduction
Brucellosis is a systemic zoonotic infection present worldwide. It is transmitted to humans by contact with body fluids of infected animals or consumption of infected animal products. Although nearly eradicated in developed countries due to proper livestock vaccination and control of food of animal origin, the disease is still endemic in the Mediterranean region, in which Turkey is also located[1, 2]. Among the six pathogenic species in the genus, four have been recognized as human pathogens: Brucella abortus, Brucella canis, Brucella suis, and the most virulent, Brucella melitensis, which is isolated in most of the cases in Turkey[1, 2]. Any organ or system of the body can be involved, with skeletal system, spleen, liver, and bone marrow being the most frequently affected sites[1]. Ocular involvement is relatively rare, reported in 3.4-26% of cases, and is usually a complication of chronic phases of the disease[3-7]. Ocular brucellosis most commonly presents with uveitis; other manifestations include keratoconjunctivitis, corneal ulcers, iridocyclitis, nummular keratitis, choroiditis, optic neuritis, papilledema, and endophthalmitis[3]. The disease has severe complications and may result in total loss of vision in a quarter of patients despite appropriate treatment[3]. Herein, we describe a case of ocular involvement of chronic brucellosis presenting with chorioretinitis that led to severe visual loss, and present a systematic review of previous cases reports and series in the literature.
Case Report
Literature Review
Herein, we reported a case of ocular involvement of chronic brucellosis presented with chorioretinitis. A literature search in PubMed on 10 September 2018 using the keywords "ocular-brucellosis" and "uveitis-brucellosis" yielded 58 and 59 articles, respectively. Constricting the search to only human studies reduced these numbers to 45 and 50, respectively. After filtering the results for those in the English literature, 27 and 29 articles remained. Of these, a total of 14 were case reports or case series and included a total of 131 cases. A flow diagram presenting the number of studies screened, assessed for eligibility, and included in the review is shown in Algorithm 1. We also found five case reports by searching for "oküler-brusella" and "göz-brusella", two in the Turkish Medline database (www.turkmedline.net) and four in Google search, with a total of six cases.
Historically, brucellosis was first recognized in the Mediterranean region, particularly in goats and sheep, dating back to antiquity. Centuries later, a British physician named David Bruce first isolated the causative organism from four fatal cases in 1887 and named the disease Micrococcus melitensis. A few decades later in 1924, Lemaire[8] described the first case of ocular involvement, a case of bilateral optic neuritis in a patient with acute brucellosis. In 1951, Pagliarani[9] published a study entitled "Contribution to the knowledge of ocular manifestations due to Brucella infection in man" in which he stated that "in these circumstances the diagnosis is less easily done and this fact makes us to believe that the incidence of ocular manifestations is more frequent than the perusal of the literature would suggest". Since then, numerous types of ocular involvement have been described, such as uveitis, dacryoadenitis, episcleritis, chronic iridoscleritis, nummular keratitis, cataract, glaucoma, multifocal choroiditis, exudative retinal detachment, maculopathy, endophthalmitis, and optic neuritis[2, 6, 10-14].
The largest series of ocular brucellosis was published by Rolando at al.[3] in 2008 in their prospective study conducted in Peru through the years 1980-2005. Of 1551 confirmed cases of brucellosis, they detected ocular involvement in 52 patients (3.35%). Uveitis (82.7% of all cases), especially posterior uveitis (40.3% of all cases), was the most common form of presentation, followed by neuro-ophthalmologic complications (13%), keratitis (5.8%), and conjunctivitis (3.8%). Most of the patients had chronic disease (86%) and females predominated (65%). Bilateral involvement was present in 20 cases (38.5%). The prognosis of the patients was generally unfavorable; 36 patients developed serious complications and 12 patients suffered complete vision loss. Prognosis was poorest in patients with panuveitis; eight of nine patients were legally blind after treatment, and five had no light perception. The authors noted that ocular damage occurs mainly in the chronic phase of the disease. Citing the work of Maini et al.[15], who stated that cataracts, glaucoma, and maculopathies have been described as the most common complications of uveitis and are the main causes of different levels of visual loss, they concluded that early diagnosis of ocular manifestations of brucellosis was critically important[16].
The other two largest series in literature were reported from Turkey, where brucellosis is still endemic. Güngör et al.[5] presented 38 and Sungur et al.[6] presented 28 cases of ocular brucellosis in which the prevalence was considerably higher compared to report of Rolando et al.[3]. In addition, there were striking differences between the findings of the two reports. Güngör et al.[5] reported a 26% incidence of ocular invasion, 71% of patients had chronic disease, 68.4% of cases presented with conjunctivitis, and 18% with uveitis. This study also reported the first two cases of dacryoadenitis and the second case of episcleritis in the literature as a part of ocular brucellosis. Sungur et al.[6] reported a 21% prevalence of ocular involvement and 59% of patients with chronic disease. The most common presentation was uveitis (50%), mainly anterior uveitis (41%), followed by choroiditis (32%), papilledema (9%), and retinal hemorrhages (9%). Interestingly, distinct from the literature, all anterior uveitis cases were in the acute stage of the disease. In both studies, most patients had no major complications and no loss of vision was reported. As a common conclusion, both authors stated that ocular manifestations of brucellosis, either in the acute or chronic stage, were much higher than expected so all cases should have a detailed ophthalmologic examination.
Discussion
Two possible mechanisms are thought to play a role in pathophysiology of ocular damage. One is mediated by the presence of B. melitensis in the acute phase of the disease and the second is mediated by specific antibodies and immune complexes present in the chronic phase. Rolando et al.[28] performed aqueous paracentesis in two ocular brucellosis cases and were able to isolate the organism in only one patient after 24 days of incubation. However, they detected positive intraocular agglutinations in all patients, suggesting the presence of specific immunoglobulins in the eye. They claimed that the immunoglobulins could act individually or through immune complexes and the deposition of immune complexes could alter the vascular permeability of the uveal tissue, producing acute transitory or recurrent uveitis. In the literature, only Faran[10] isolated Brucella from the vitreous humor in a patient with endophthalmitis. We did not perform ocular puncture in our patients, as it is not a routine diagnostic procedure. One of the main disadvantages of routine aqueous humor analysis is the small quantity of fluid obtained, which limits the number of tests that may be done on a single specimen.
Although it may occur at any stage, ocular damage seems to be more common and severe in the chronic phase of the disease. According to the report from Rolando et al.[3], 0.003% of children with a diagnosis of systemic brucellosis had ocular involvement. This finding supports the hypothesis as children rarely develop the chronic form of the disease. Brucellosis is a systemic disease that has a wide spectrum of clinical manifestations and may be difficult to recognize, especially in the absence of classical symptoms. This is particularly problematic with the chronic form and some rare presentations, such as ocular brucellosis, must be considered when making a differential diagnosis.
Our patient first presented with a considerable decrease in visual acuity and a diagnosis of brucellosis was made after etiological investigation. The patient had permanent severe sequelae despite appropriate treatment. We believe that in an endemic area such as Turkey, routine ophthalmologic evaluation of all patients diagnosed with brucellosis as well as testing for brucellosis in all patients who present with classical patterns of ocular brucellosis such as uveitis will facilitate immediate initiation of appropriate treatment and help prevent progression to chronic disease and severe sequelae.
Ethics
Informed Consent: Consent form was filled out by the patient.
Peer-review: Externally and internally peer-reviewed.
Authorship Contributions
Surgical and Medical Practices: M.U.Ç., G.K., Concept: M.U.Ç., Design: A.I.O., Data Collection or Processing: A.I.O., H.Ö.Ö., D.Y.Y., Analysis or Interpretation: A.I.O., Literature Search: A.I.O., D.Y.Y., U.S., Writing: A.I.O.
Conflict of Interest:No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.
Financial Disclosure: The authors declared that this study received no financial support.
