Summary

Introduction: The healthcare burden of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae) infections is growing. The newly developed beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combination, ceftazidime-avibactam, shows promise in the treatment of such infections. We aimed to explore the in vitro efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam against carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae isolates carrying the bla_OXA-48 gene.
Materials and Methods: The isolates were identified using MALDI-TOF MS (Brucker, USA). The isolates that were non-susceptible to imipenem, meropenem, or ertapenem by the disk diffusion method using the European Committee of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) breakpoints were screenes. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values were determined via broth microdilution according to the EUCAST criteria. A time-kill study was performed according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. Beta-lactamase genes were screened for using polymerase chain reaction with previously published primers.
Results: A total of 129 K. pneumoniae isolated between April 2011 and February 2021 were studied. Of these, 98, 23, and eight isolates carried the bla_OXA-48, bla_NDM, and bla_OXA-48 with bla_NDM genes, respectively. All isolates carrying the bla_NDM gene were resistant to ceftazidime-avibactam. Approximately 79.6% of the bla_OXA-48-positive isolates were susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam. The time-kill study for ceftazidime-avibactam was performed with one bla_OXA-48-positive isolate (MIC, 4 mg/l). Ceftazidime-avibactam time-kill kinetics were evaluated in multiples of MIC. There was a decrease of ≥3-log10 in CFU/ml count at a concentration of 8, 16, and 32 MIC at 6 hours. The minimum bactericidal concentration was 8 mg/l.
Conclusion: Ceftazidime-avibactam is an important treatment alternative alternative for bla_OXA-48 positive carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae infections. The most rational approach to the treatment of carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae infections appears to be the initiatiion of targeted therapy according to culture antibiogram results or revision of the empirically initiated combination or monotherapy as early as possible according to culture antibiogram results.

Introduction

Multidrug resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae) isolates is rapidly becoming a significant concern in Turkey as well as worldwide. This results in a significant increase in mortality, morbidity, and treatment costs^{[1, 2]}. Due to the increasing incidence of drug resistance, treatments should be initiated after considering the resistance status of the relevant organism in the unit or region and the appropriate antibiotic. Particular difficulties exist in treating infections caused by carbapenem-resistant isolates with the antibiotics currently being used. Because current treatment options are limited, studies are being conducted to identify new treatment methods. The newly developed beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations containing ceftazidime-avibactam is a promising candidate for the treatment of these multidrug-resistant infections^[3]. Avibactam is effective against class A and C beta-lactamases, partially effective against class D beta-lactamases, and ineffective against metallo-beta-lactamases^[4]. The OXA-48 enzyme was first detected in a K. pneumoniae isolate in Turkey in 2001^{[5, 6]}. Since 2008, K. pneumoniae isolates producing OXA-48 carbapenemase have been reported in European countries such as France, Greece, Belgium, the Netherlands, Spain, and Turkey^{[7, 8]}. In their multicenter and multinational study, Castanheira et al.^[9] determined that the rate of isolates producing OXA-48-like beta-lactamase increased from 0.5% in 2016 to 0.9% in 2018, with OXA-48 being the most common variant.

Most of the previous studies have focused on investigating the susceptibility of K. pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-type beta-lactamases to ceftazidime-avibactam^{[10, 11]}. In Turkey, OXA-48 (70.5-83.1%) and NDM (6.5-25%) are the most commonly detected beta-lactamases in K. pneumoniae isolates, with a coexistence rate of 2.4-4.5%^{[12, 13]}. According to a study that evaluated the incidence of transferable carbapenemase genes in carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae in Turkey, 95 of the 100 isolates carried at least one of the genes (OXA-48: 81.05%, NDM: 38.9%, KPC: 9.47%, VIM: 1.05%). One isolate carried the OXA-48 and KPC genes and two isolates carried the KPC and NDM genes^[14]. Only a few studies have assessed the susceptibility of OXA-48 type beta-lactamases, which are mainly responsible for carbapenem resistance in K. pneumoniae isolates in Turkey, to ceftazidime-avibactam^[15-17]. Herein, we aimed to explore the in vitro efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam against carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae isolates carrying the bla_OXA-48gene.

Methods

Study Design and Setting

This study was planned as a national, multicenter, in vitro experimental study. A total of 132 carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae isolates were included in the study. Of these 132 isoloates, 100 were clinical isolates obtained from 100 patients between November 2019 and February 2021 at the Başkent University’s and İstanbul Medeniyet University, Göztepe Training and Research Hospital’s medical microbiology laboratories. The remaining 32 isolates, whose resistance patterns have already been determined molecularly, were obtained from 32 patients between April 2011 and December 2014 at Kartal Dr. Lütfi Kırdar City Hospital’s clinical microbiology laboratory^{[13, 18]}. Only a single carbapenem-resistant isolate from each patient was included in the study. The isolates were stored at -80 °C until examined. Three non-viable isolates (one obtained between 2019 and 2021 and two obtained between 2011 and 2014) were excluded from the study. Finally, 129 carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae isolates were included in the study.

Identification of Isolates and Detection of Carbapenem Resistance and Carbapenemase Genes

The isolates were identified using Bruker Biotyper MALDI-TOF MS (Billerica, MA, USA). The isolates that were not susceptible to imipenem, meropenem, or ertapenem by the disk diffusion method using the European Committee of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST)^[19] breakpoints were screened for the bla_OXA-48and bla_NDM genes. The DNA was isolated by boiling the bacterial suspensions at 95 °C for 10 min and immediately cooled on ice. After centrifugation at 14,000 rpm for 10 min, the DNA was recovered from the supernatant^[20]. The primer sequences targeting the bla_OXA-48and bla_NDM genes were 5¢-GCGTGGTTAAGGATGAACAC-3¢ (OXA-48-F), 5¢- CATCAAGTTCAACCCAACCG-3¢ (OXA-48-R), 5¢-GGTTTGGCGATCTGGTTTTTC-3¢ (NDM-F), 5¢-CGGAATGGCTCATCACGATC-3¢ (NDM-R) (Oligomer, Turkey). These primer sets amplify the 438 and 621 bp fragments. PCR was performed as previously described by Poirel et al.^[21]. The PCR amplicon was analyzed using 2% agarose gel electrophoresis at 100 V for 1 h in 1X tris-borate-EDTA containing 0.05 mg/L ethidium bromide. Confirmed positive strains of K. pneumoniae CDC529 carrying bla_NDM-1or bla_OXA-48(n=15) were used as positive controls. E. coli ATCC25922 was used as a negative control^[18].

Microdilution Tests

To determine the ceftazidime-avibactam minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values, the ceftazidime concentrations on microplates were diluted to 0.25-128 mg/l. Avibactam was added to each well with a final concentration of 4 mg/l. A 24-hour culture was used for all isolates to be studied. After preparing the isolate suspensions at 0.5 McFarland standard, the samples were diluted by 1/10 and 5 µl of the suspension was added to each well. The microplates were incubated at 37 °C for 18 to 24 hours. The lowest antibiotic concentration without growth was determined as the MIC value. The susceptibility results of the isolates were interpreted based on the EUCAST standards^[19].

Time-kill Study

A time-kill study was performed according to previously published methods, including those described by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute document M26-A^{[22, 23]}. Freshly prepared colonies were resuspended in 10 ml of cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth (CAMHB) and incubated in a shaking water bath (at 37 °C and 180 rpm) for 1-2 hours. The cultures were prepared according to the 0.5 McFarland standard (approximately 10⁸ CFU/ml) and further diluted to the ratio of 1:20 in CAMHB making the initial inoculum approximately 5×10⁶ CFU/ml. Ceftazidime was added to the prepared bacterial suspensions such that the final ceftazidime concentration was 2, 4, or 8 times the MIC of the ceftazidime-avibactam of the isolate selected. Avibactam was added to a final concentration of 4 mg/l. An antibiotic-free growth control was also included. The initial inoculum concentration was determined from the growth control tube immediately after dilution and recorded as the count at time zero. After the addition of antibiotics, the initial inoculum concentration ranged from 1 × 10⁶ to 5 × 10⁶CFU/ml. The tubes were incubated in a shaking water bath (at 37 °C and 180 rpm) and 100 µl of the culture sample was inoculated onto Tryptic Soy Agar (TSA) at 1, 2, 4, 6, and 24 h. The TSA plates were incubated at 37 °C for at least 18 hours. The colonies were counted and recorded as CFU/ml. A 3-log10 reduction in CFU/ml count was considered bactericidal.

Statistical Analysis

Categorical data are presented as frequencies and percentages. The categorical data were evaluated using the chi-square test, and p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Of the 129 carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae isolates included in the study, 98 were bla_OXA-48positive, eight were bla_OXA-48and bla_NDM-positive, and 23 were bla_NDM-positive. Of the 129 isolates, 47 were obtained from blood, 36 from urine, 25 from respiratory secretions, 14 from wound and tissue cultures, four from body fluids, and three from catheter cultures.

All the bla_NDM-positive isolates were resistant to ceftazidime-avibactam. Approximately 79.6% of the bla_OXA-48-positive isolates were susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam. The in vitro activity of ceftazidime-avibactam against carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae is shown in Table 1.

Table 1: In vitro activity of ceftazidime-avibactam against carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae

The in vitro activity of ceftazidime-avibactam by the source isolates against carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae is shown in Table 2. While all the isolates obtained from body fluids and catheters were susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam, 55.3% of the isolates obtained from blood samples and 50.0% of the isolates obtained from urine samples were susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam.

Table 2: In vitro activity of ceftazidime-avibactam based on isolate source

The susceptibility rates of bla_OXA-48-positive carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae strains from 2011 to 2014 to ceftazidime-avibactam were higher than those of the bla_OXA-48-positive carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae strains from 2019 to 2021 (85.7% vs. 77.9%); however, this difference was not significant (p=0.4). A yearly comparison of the in vitro efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam against bla_OXA-48-positive carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae is shown in Table 3.

Table 3: In vitro ceftazidime-avibactam efficacy on bla_OXA-48-positive carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae based on the time period when the sample was obtained

Time-kill Study

The time-kill study performed on a carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae isolate (OXA 48, MIC=4 mg/l) revealed a 3-log10 reduction in CFU/ml count with 8×, 16×, and 32× the MICs of ceftazidime-avibactam at 6 hours (Figure 1). The minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) was 8 mg/L.

Figure 1: Time-kill graph of ceftazidime-avibactam for bla_OXA-48-positive Klebsiella pneumoniae isolate (MIC=4 mg/l)
MIC: Minimum inhibitory concentration

Discussion

In the present study, a total of 129 carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae isolates obtained from two different geographical areas and different centers were evaluated. All the isolates that were bla_OXA-48- and bla_NDM-positive and those that were only bla_NDM-positive were resistant to ceftazidime-avibactam. In contrast, 79.6% of the bla_OXA-48-positive isolates were susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam. The time-kill study revealed that treatment with 8×, 16×, and 32× the MICs of ceftazidime-avibactam at 6 hours resulted in at least a 3-log10 reduction in CFU/ml. Furthermore, the MBC was 8 mg/L.

In a study conducted in Spain, which evaluated OXA-48 carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae isolates from urinary samples, all the isolates were susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam^[15]. In a recent study, Ozger et al. reported a susceptibility rate of 95.2% to ceftazidime-avibactam in 84 OXA-48 and KPC types of carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae isolates obtained from three different centers from a single city between 2016 and 2018 by broth microdilution^[24]. Hoşbul et al.^[15] determined that 92.7% of the 150 carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae isolates evaluated were susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam. Of the ceftazidime-avibactam-resistant isolates, seven were bla_NDM-positive, three were bla_KPC-positive, and one was bla_OXA-48- and bla_NDM-positive. For all isolates without carbapenemase differentiation, the MIC50 and MIC90 values for ceftazidime-avibactam were 1 and 8 µg/ml, respectively. Terzi et al.^[25] evaluated the antibiotic susceptibility of 22 carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae isolates and determined that among the eight isolates producing only OXA-48, all were susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam. Studies have reported high and low susceptibility rates in carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae isolates. Karlowsky et al.^[16] reported that 51.8% of the 85 carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae isolates examined were susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam, while 89.8% of the 49 MBL-negative carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae isolates were susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam. A single-center study in 2017, reported a ceftazidime-avibactam susceptibility of 52% in 42 OXA-48-producing K. pneumoniae isolates, with MIC50 and MIC90 values of 8 and 256 mg/l, respectively^[26]. Antibiotic susceptibilities may vary in different geographical locations, centers, and times. This may be due to the presence of undetected resistance genes. In the present study, the ceftazidime-avibactam susceptibility of 98 OXA-48 carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae isolates obtained from two different geographical regions and different centers was approximately 80%, with MIC50 and MIC90 of 4 and 64 mg/l, respectively.

In our study most of the isolates were obtanined from blood and urine cultures. The resistance rate of isolates obtained from blood and urine samples to ceftazidime-avibactam was higher than that of isolates obtained from respiratory secretions, wound/tissue, body fluids, and catheter cultures. Another study from Turkey reported a higher resistance rate to ceftazidime-avibactam in blood culture isolates than in isolates obtained from other sources^[27].

Keepers et al.^[22] evaluated the time-kill kinetics of ceftazidime-avibactam for all Enterobacteriaceae isolates included in their study (wild-type, ESBL, carbapenemase- and/or AmpC-producing K. pneumoniae) and reported a ≥3-log10 reduction in CFU/ml count after 6 hours. In the present study, the time- and concentration-dependent bactericidal effect of ceftazidime-avibactam on OXA-48 carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae isolates was determined by the time-kill method. Similar to the study findings of Keepers et al.^[22], a decrease of at least 3-log10 in CFU/ml count was observed at 6 hours with 8×, 16×, and 32× the MICs of ceftazidime-avibactam.

When this study was initiated, ceftazidime-avibactam was yet to be covered by insurance for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae in Turkey. Since then, it has been included in the reimbursement schemes for the treatment of patients with carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae, who have been hospitalized in the intensive care unit for over a year, with a proven antibiotic susceptibility based on culture antibiogram results. The unnecessary and frequent use of antibiotics may cause antibiotic resistance. Development of resistance during the use of ceftazidime-avibactam has been reported in literature^{[28, 29]}. Clinicians should adhere to the principles of rational use of antibiotics and infection control practices to prevent the development of resistance to certain antibiotics which are used as the last line of defense in the treatment of resistant infections.

A study evaluating the efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam in solid organ transplant recipients with bloodstream infections caused by carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae reported that patients treated with ceftazidime-avibactam had higher 14-day and 30-day clinical success rates and lower 30-day mortality rates than those receiving the best available therapy. Combination therapy was not associated with better outcomes in the ceftazidime-avibactam group^[30]. The optimal treatment of infection caused by the NDM-producing K. pneumoniae strain remains uncertain and antibiotic options are limited. The combination of ceftazidime-avibactam and aztreonam or cefiderocol, can be a treatment option for NDM-producing K. pneumoniae infections^[31].

Study Limitations

This study has some limitations. It was designed as an in vitro study and the results are not supported by clinical data. Furthermore, resistance genes other than OXA-48 and NDM beta-lactamases could not be investigated in the isolates.

Conclusion

All the bla_NDM-positive carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae isolates included in the study were resistant to ceftazidime-avibactam. Approximately 80% of the bla_OXA-48-producing carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae isolates were susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam. Ceftazidime-avibactam appears to be an important treatment alternative for isolates producing OXA-48 beta-lactamase. In the treatment of carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae infections, the most rational approach appears to be the initiation of targeted therapy according to culture antibiogram results or revision of the empirically initiated combination or mono-therapy as early as possible based on culture antibiogram results.

Acknowledgments

The laboratory studies of the project were carried out in the laboratories of İstanbul Medeniyet University BİLTAM [İstanbul Medeniyet University, Science and Advanced Technologies Research Center (BİLTAM), 34700, İstanbul, Turkey]. We would like to thank pharmacist Aysegül ÇAŞKURLU for her contribution to our study.

Ethics

Ethics Committee Approval and Informed Consent: The study was approved by the Ethical Committee of the İstanbul Medeniyet University, Göztepe Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey, on January 02, 2019 with number 2018/0514, and signed informed consent was waived.

Peer-review: Externally peer-reviewed.

Authorship Contributions

Surgical and Medical Practices: Y.Ç., H.Ç., R.A.Ç., M.E.K., H.V., D.H., H.C.M., A.Ü.G., Concept: Y.Ç., R.A.Ç., M.E.K., H.V., D.H., Design: Y.Ç., M.E.K., Data Collection or Processing: Y.Ç., H.Ç., R.A.Ç., M.E.K., D.H., Analysis or Interpretation: Y.Ç., H.V., Literature Search: H.C.M., A.Ü.G., Y.Ç., H.Ç., R.A.Ç., M.E.K., D.H., Writing: Y.Ç.

Conflict of Interest: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Financial Disclosure: This work was supported by the Research Fund of İstanbul Medeniyet University (project number: T-GAP-2020-1655).

References

1Ben-David D, Kordevani R, Keller N, Tal I, Marzel A, Gal-Mor O, Maor Y, Rahav G. Outcome of carbapenem resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infections. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18:54-60.

2Baykara N, Akalın H, Arslantaş MK, Hancı V, Çağlayan Ç, Kahveci F, Demirağ K, Baydemir C, Ünal N; Sepsis Study Group. Epidemiology of sepsis in intensive care units in Turkey: a multicenter, point-prevalence study. Crit Care. 2018;22:93.

3Torres A, Zhong N, Pachl J, Timsit JF, Kollef M, Chen Z, Song J, Taylor D, Laud PJ, Stone GG, Chow JW. Ceftazidime-avibactam versus meropenem in nosocomial pneumonia, including ventilator-associated pneumonia (REPROVE): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018;18:285-95.

4Zhanel GG, Lawson CD, Adam H, Schweizer F, Zelenitsky S, Lagacé-Wiens PR, Denisuik A, Rubinstein E, Gin AS, Hoban DJ, Lynch JP, Karlowsky JA. Ceftazidime-avibactam: a novel cephalosporin/β-lactamase inhibitor combination. Drugs. 2013;73:159-77.

5Cag Y, Caskurlu H, Fan Y, Cao B, Vahaboglu H. Resistance mechanisms. Ann Transl Med. 2016;4:326.

6Poirel L, Héritier C, Tolün V, Nordmann P. Emergence of oxacillinase-mediated resistance to imipenem in Klebsiella pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004;48:15-22.

7Kasap M, Torol S, Kolayli F, Dundar D, Vahaboglu H. OXA-162, a novel variant of OXA-48 displays extended hydrolytic activity towards imipenem, meropenem and doripenem. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem. 2013;28:990-6.

8Potron A, Poirel L, Rondinaud E, Nordmann P. Intercontinental spread of OXA-48 beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae over a 11-year period, 2001 to 2011. Euro Surveill. 2013;18:20549.

9Castanheira M, Doyle TB, Collingsworth TD, Sader HS, Mendes RE. Increasing frequency of OXA-48-producing Enterobacterales worldwide and activity of ceftazidime/avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam and comparators against these isolates. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2021;76:3125-34.

10Shields RK, Clancy CJ, Hao B, Chen L, Press EG, Iovine NM, Kreiswirth BN, Nguyen MH. Effects of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase subtypes, extended-spectrum β-lactamases, and porin mutations on the in vitro activity of ceftazidime-avibactam against carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59:5793-7.

11Petraitiene R, Petraitis V, Kavaliauskas P, Maung BBW, Khan F, Naing E, Aung T, Zigmantaite V, Grigaleviciute R, Kucinskas A, Stakauskas R, Georgiades BN, Mazur CA, Hayden JA, Satlin MJ, Walsh TJ. Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy of Ceftazidime-Avibactam in the Treatment of Experimental Pneumonia Caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae Carbapenemase-Producing K. pneumoniae in Persistently Neutropenic Rabbits. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020;64:e02157-19.

12Çakar A, Akyön Y, Gür D, Karatuna O, Öğünç D, Özhak Baysan B, Çöplü N, Çağatay M, Kılıç A, Baysallar M, Bakıcı Z, Çelik C, Gülay Z, Aydemir Ş, Tünger A, Kılıç H, Erçal BD, Aşçı Toraman Z, Zer Y, Büyüktaş A, Ay S, Aktaş Z, Kayacan Ç, Bayramoğlu G, Aydın F, Dündar D, Hasdemir U, Ayaş R, Yanık K, Günaydın M, Güdücüoğlu H, Parlak M. Türkiye’de 2014 yılı içinde izole edilen karbapeneme dirençli Escherichia coli ve Klebsiella pneumoniae izolatlarında karbapenemaz varlığının araştırılması [Investigation of carbapenemases in carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae strains isolated in 2014 in Turkey]. Mikrobiyol Bul. 2016;50:21-33.

13Haciseyitoglu D, Dokutan A, Abulaila A, Erdem F, Cag Y, Ozer S, Aktas Z. The First Enterobacter cloacae Co-Producing NDM and OXA-48 Carbapenemases and Interhospital Spread of OXA-48 and NDM-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in Turkey. Clin Lab. 2017;63:1213-22.

14Genç S, Kolaylı F, Özçelik EY. Molecular characterization of carbapenemase producing Klebsiella pneumoniae strains by multiplex PCR and PFGE methods: The first K. pneumoniae isolates co-producing OXA-48/KPC and KPC/NDM in Turkey. J Infect Chemother. 2022;28:192-8.

15Hoşbul T, Aydoğan CN, Kaya S, Bedir O, Gümral R, Albay A. Karbapenem Dirençli Klebsiella pneumoniae Klinik İzolatlarına Karşı Seftazidim-avibaktam ve Kolistinin In Vitro Etkinliği [In Vitro Activity of Ceftazidime-avibactam and Colistin Against Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Clinical Isolates]. Mikrobiyol Bul. 2022;56:218-29.

16Karlowsky JA, Kazmierczak KM, Bouchillon SK, de Jonge BLM, Stone GG, Sahm DF. In Vitro Activity of Ceftazidime-Avibactam against Clinical Isolates of Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Collected in Asia-Pacific Countries: Results from the INFORM Global Surveillance Program, 2012 to 2015. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018;62:e02569-17.

17García-Castillo M, García-Fernández S, Gómez-Gil R, Pitart C, Oviaño M, Gracia-Ahufinger I, Díaz-Regañón J, Tato M, Cantón R; iCREST Study Group. Activity of ceftazidime-avibactam against carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae from urine specimens obtained during the infection-carbapenem resistance evaluation surveillance trial (iCREST) in Spain. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2018;51:511-5.

18Ince G, Mirza HC, Üsküdar Güçlü A, Gümüş H, Erol Ç, Başustaoğlu A. Comparison of in vitro activities of plazomicin and other aminoglycosides against clinical isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2021;76:3192-6.

19EUCAST: Clinical breakpoints and dosing of antibiotics [Internet]. Available from: https://www.eucast.org/clinical_breakpoints

20Uskudar-Guclu A, Guney M, Sig AK, Kilic S, Baysallar M. Arising Prevalence of OXA-48 producer Escherichia coli and OXA-48 with NDM co-producer Klebsiella pneumoniae Strains. Rev Rom Med Lab. 2019;27:319-26.

21Poirel L, Walsh TR, Cuvillier V, Nordmann P. Multiplex PCR for detection of acquired carbapenemase genes. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2011;70:119-23.

22Keepers TR, Gomez M, Celeri C, Nichols WW, Krause KM. Bactericidal activity, absence of serum effect, and time-kill kinetics of ceftazidime-avibactam against β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58:5297-305.

23M26-A Methods for Determining Bactericidal Activity of Antimicrobial Agents; Approved Guideline This document provides procedures for determining the lethal activity of antimicrobial agents. 1999. Available from: https://clsi.org/media/1462/m26a_sample.pdf

24Ozger HS, Evren E, Yildiz SS, Erol C, Bayrakdar F, Azap O, Azap A, Senol E. Ceftazidime - Avibactam susceptibility among carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales in a pilot study in Turkey. Acta Microbiol Immunol Hung. 2021.

25Terzi HA, Aydemir Ö, Demiray T, Köroğlu M, Altindiş M, Üreten K, İlaca Ç, Klebsiella D, Seftolozan-Tazobaktam İ, Değerlendirilmesi S-AE. Evaluation of In Vitro Activity of Ceftolozane-tazobactam and Ceftazidime-avibactam Against Carbapenemase-producing Multi-drug Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolates. Mediterr J Infect Microb Antimicrob. 2020;9:11.

26Mataraci Kara E, Yilmaz M, Istanbullu Tosun A, Özbek Çelik B. Evaluation of the synergy of ceftazidime/avibactam in combination with colistin, doripenem, levofloxacin, tigecycline, and tobramycin against OXA-48 producing Enterobacterales. J Chemother. 2020;32:171-8.

27Dumlu R, Uyar NY, Ayaş M, Aksoy N, Öztürk N, Kocagöz AS. Investigation of ceftazidime-avibactam susceptibility in clinical isolates of gram-negative bacteria. Turk J Med Sci. 2022;52:1839-44.

28Shields RK, Nguyen MH, Chen L, Press EG, Kreiswirth BN, Clancy CJ. Pneumonia and Renal Replacement Therapy Are Risk Factors for Ceftazidime-Avibactam Treatment Failures and Resistance among Patients with Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018;62:e02497-17.

29Shields RK, Chen L, Cheng S, Chavda KD, Press EG, Snyder A, Pandey R, Doi Y, Kreiswirth BN, Nguyen MH, Clancy CJ. Emergence of Ceftazidime-Avibactam Resistance Due to Plasmid-Borne blaKPC-3 Mutations during Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017;61:e02097-16.

30Pérez-Nadales E, Fernández-Ruiz M, Natera AM, Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez B, Mularoni A, Russelli G, Pierrotti LC, Pinheiro Freire M, Falcone M, Tiseo G, Tumbarello M, Raffaelli F, Abdala E, Bodro M, Gervasi E, Fariñas MC, Seminari EM, Castón JJ, Marín-Sanz JA, Gálvez-Soto V, Rana MM, Loeches B, Martín-Dávila P, Pascual Á, Rodríguez-Baño J, Aguado JM, Martínez-Martínez L, Torre-Cisneros J; REIPI/INCREMENT-SOT Study Group. Efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam in solid organ transplant recipients with bloodstream infections caused by carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae. Am J Transplant. 2023;23:1022-34.

31Isler B, Aslan AT, Akova M, Harris P, Paterson DL. Treatment strategies for OXA-48-like and NDM producing Klebsiella pneumoniae infections. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2022;20:1389-400.

In Vitro Efficacy of Ceftazidime-avibactam Against blaOXA-48-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolates