Fungemia due to Rare Yeasts Other Than <em>Candida</em>: 10 Years of Single-center Experience
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
RESEARCH ARTICLE
P: 9-9
January 2023

Fungemia due to Rare Yeasts Other Than Candida: 10 Years of Single-center Experience

Mediterr J Infect Microb Antimicrob 2023;12(1):9-9
1. Karadeniz Technical University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Trabzon, Turkey
2. Karadeniz Technical University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Microbiology, Trabzon, Turkey
No information available.
No information available
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

Summary

Introduction: Fungemia due to rare yeasts other than Candida (RYOC) has been increasingly reported; however, data on the management of patients are limited. This study aimed to determine antifungal susceptibility profiles of the isolates and clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes of patients with fungemia due to RYOC in a tertiary-care university hospital.
Materials and Methods: Between January 2013 and January 2022, cases of fungemia caused by RYOC were retrospectively examined. Antifungal susceptibility tests were performed according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute M27-A3.
Results: The incidence of RYOC was  %4,9 (n=31) among 637 fungemia episodes. The most common isolated fungi were Trichosporon asahii (n=11). An antifungal susceptibility test could be performed on 25/31 strains. Azole minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values ​​were low for T. asahii and T. coremiiforme. Amphotericin-B and voriconazole (VRC) MICs were low for Saprochaete clavata isolates, whereas those of fluconazole (FLC) and echinocandin ​​were high. The most commonly preferred empirical antifungal was liposomal amphotericin-B (n=7) followed by VRC (n=4) and FLC (n=2). Of the 13 patients who received appropriate treatment either started empirically or after identification, 10 survived (p=0.01). The overall mortality rate was 53% (n=16). The mortality rate of patients with hematologic malignancy was significantly higher than that other patients with risk factors (p=0.01). Of the patients in whom appropriate treatment was initiated, three died because the foci of infection could not be controlled.
Conclusion: Maintaining high clinical suspicion of RYOC is crucial in empirical treatment. Early detection of species and determining antifungal susceptibility patterns of RYOC will guide clinicians in the treatment of these yeasts.

Keywords:
Fungemia, antifungal agents, invasive fungal infections

Introduction

The epidemiology of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) has changed because of empirical antifungal treatment strategies in the growing population of patients with immunosuppression[1]. Candida spp. is the most common cause of IFIs worldwide (63-70%)[1]. However, rare yeasts other than Candida (RYOC) - Saccharomyces, Saprochaete, Trichosporon, Cryptococcus, Rhodotorula, and Malassezia spp. - are causing sporadic outbreaks over the past two decades[2-4]. The Infectious Diseases Society of America (2016) and European Conference on Infections in Leukemia-6 (2017) guidelines recommend the use of echinocandin as the first step in the management of fungemia[5, 6]. However, the majority of RYOC have intrinsic resistance or decreased susceptibility to echinocandins[1, 7]. Given the limited data on antifungal susceptibility patterns of rare yeasts and the paucity of susceptibility breakpoints, evidence for the management of these fungi is scarce[8]. Thus, this study aimed to determine the clinical characteristics of patients with bloodstream infection caused by RYOC, antifungal minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values of isolates, and effectiveness of antifungal treatments.

Methods

Between January 2013 and January 2022, cases of fungemia caused by RYOC were retrospectively examined, and data were collected from electronic records. Fungemia caused by rare yeasts was defined as RYOC isolated in one or more blood culture in patients with clinical signs of infection such as fever and/or sepsis. In patients who had fungemia more than once, the first culture was assessed. The presence of a central venous catheter (CVC), parenteral nutrition, history of antibiotic therapy, hospitalization in the intensive care unit (ICU), neutropenia, and history of surgery were accepted as risk factors of IFIs[9]. Neutropenia was defined as the absolute number of neutrophils of <500 cells/ml. Peripherally inserted central catheters and port catheters were considered CVCs. The administration of any antimicrobial drug in the month preceding the episode of fungemia was considered a previous antimicrobial exposure. Surgical operations performed within the last month were considered surgical history. In evaluating the appropriate antifungal therapy, the microorganisms, MIC values, and guideline recommendations were taken into consideration[7].

Clinical specimens were cultured on a Sabouraud dextrose agar (SDA) medium and were incubated for 24-48 h at 35 °C and 25 °C. Colonies formed in the SDA medium were identified using API-ID-20C-AUX (Bio-Merieux, Brussels, Belgium) and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF) (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany) in addition to conventional methods. Owing to the widespread application of molecular technologies in taxonomy, fungal species have undergone a significant nomenclature change[10]. In this study, Candida krusei, Candida kefyr, Saprochaete clavata, and Cryptococcus laurentii were renamed to Pichia kudriavzevii, Kluyveromyces marxianus, Magnusiomyces clavatus, and Papiliotrema laurentii, respectively. In vitro susceptibility tests against amphotericin-B (AMB), fluconazole (FLC), itraconazole, posaconazole, voriconazole (VRC), caspofungin (CAS), micafungin, and anidulafungin were performed using Sensititre® YeastOne (TREK Diagnostic System, East Grinstead, UK) based on Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute standards[11].

The study protocol was approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Karadeniz Technical University on April 29, 2022 (no: 2022-73), and study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences statistics version 23.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Quantitative data were presented as mean±standard deviation or median with interquartile range (IQR). Fisher’s exact test was used to compare the ratios of categorical variables. A p value <0.05 was considered significant.

Results

The demographic data and clinical characteristics of the patients are given in Table 1. C. neoformans were isolated in the blood cultures of two patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. In our study, 637 fungemia cases were detected. Of these cases,  %4,9 were caused by non-Candida yeasts. Among the isolated agents, 11 (35.5%) were Trichosporon asahii, 1 (3.2%) Trichosporon coremiiforme, 9 (29%) Saprochaete clavata (formerly Geotrichum spp.), 2 (6.5%) Saccharomyces cerevisiae, 4 (12.9%) Cryptococcus neoformans, 1 (3.2%) Cryptococcus laurentii, 2 (6.5%) Rhodotorula rubra, and 1 (3.2%) Rhodotorula mucilaginosa. No clustering was observed during the study period. In 15 of the patients, the growth of the same fungal species responsible for fungemia was isolated in clinical samples taken from other regions, i.e., four in urine samples, three in CVCs, 2 in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), 1 each in the CVC and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), one each in the CSF and BAL, one in CVC, and one in the peritoneal culture.

Table 1: Demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients with fungemia

The median time to the onset of fungemia was 16 (IQR=7-30) days of hospitalization. Data from 24 patients revealed that the median time to initial fungal growth in blood cultures during incubation was 120 h (IQR=84-137). In addition to RYOC, Candida spp. was isolated in blood cultures of eight patients (C. albicans in six, C. krusei in one, C. kefyr in one, and C. parapsilosis in one patient). Sixteen (53%) of the patients died. The median time from fungemia onset to death was 6 (IQR=3.5-9.5) days. The mortality rate of patients with hematologic malignancy was significantly higher than that in other patients with risk factors [p=0.01; Odds ratio (OR)=10.8; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.79-65.55]. An antifungal susceptibility test could be performed on 25/31 (80%) strains. Since the susceptibility breakpoints for these species have not yet been determined, the distribution of MIC values for each tested antifungal is given in Table 2.

Table 2: Minimum inhibitory concentration ranges (μg/ml) for each antifungal drug tested for rare yeast

Characteristics, antifungal susceptibilities, and antifungal management of patients with Trichosporon spp. fungemia are shown in Table 3. Of the 12 patients with Trichosporon spp. fungemia, four were followed up for solid-organ tumors. Among them, a 71-year-old male patient who was diagnosed with metastatic bladder cancer, yeast-isolated blood and nephrostomy culture was taken on day 15 of hospitalization, and VRC (MIC=0.03 µg/ml) was started. The nephrostomy could not be removed because of the patient’s unstable clinical condition, and fungemia continued on day 5 of treatment. The patient died on day 7 of therapy. In a 73-year-old man with prostate cancer, T. asahii growth was reported in the blood and nephrostomy culture on day 24 of the ICU follow-up. The patient was started on VRC (MIC=0.03 µg/ml), and treatment was revised to liposomal amphotericin-B (L-AmB) (MIC=0.25 µg/ml) due to a decrease in the glomerular filtration rate, and he died on day 10 of therapy. In a 56-year-old woman with bilateral nephrostomy due to ovarian cancer, T. asahii was isolated in the blood and nephrostomy culture on day 10 of hospitalization, and she was started on VRC (MIC=1 µg/ml). After the nephrostomies were revised, the treatment was completed, and no relapse was observed. In a 77-year-old man with lung adenocarcinoma, yeast was isolated in his blood culture on day 22 of admission. Fluconazole was started, and C. parapsilosis (MIC=0.125 µg/ml) and T. asahii (MIC=2 µg/ml) were isolated in the blood culture. The patient’s urinary catheter and CVCs were removed, and he was on a 14-day regimen. In addition, a 44-year-old man was receiving broad-spectrum antibiotics for hospital-associated pneumonia due to multidrug-resistant microorganism in the ICU where he was followed for Coronavirus disease-2019. T. asahii was isolated in the blood and urine cultures taken on day 30 of hospitalization. The patient died before the growth in the blood culture was detected.

Table 3: Characteristics, antifungal susceptibilities, and antifungal management of the patients with fungemia due to Trichosporon asahii

Saprochaete clavata was isolated in nine patients. Characteristics, antifungal susceptibilities, and antifungal management of the patients are shown in Table 4. Yeast was reported in the culture, and eight of the patients were receiving empirical antifungal therapy (CAS or L-AmB). Among them, a 16-year-old man with AML had fever on day 38 of L-AmB therapy, and blood cultures were taken in addition to oral mucosal biopsy. Voriconazole (MIC=0.12 µg/ml) was added to the treatment after S. clavata growth was detected. The patient, whose skin lesions progressed under treatment and clinical conditions worsened, died on day 4 of the revision.

Table 4: Characteristics, antifungal susceptibilities, and antifungal management of patients with fungemia due to Saprochaete clavata

Rhodotorula rubra was isolated in two patients: an 18-year-old man admitted in the ICU because of pneumonia. Empirical FLC was started due to C. albicans colonization in the urinary catheter, and fever was observed under broad-spectrum antibiotics. On day 7 of treatment, yeast was isolated in the CVC and blood, and treatment was revised as CAS (MIC=0.5 µg/ml). After the catheter removal, the patient was cured with 20-day antifungal regimen.

Two of the 15 patients who had not received empirical antifungal therapy died before yeast growth in the blood was detected. The most common preferred empirical antifungal was L-AmB (n=7), followed by VRC (n=4) and FLC (n=2). Of the 13 patients who received appropriate treatment either started empirically or after identification, 10 survived. Among 18 patients who did not receive appropriate treatment, only five survived (p=0.01, OR=8.67, 95% CI=1.66-45.2). Of the patients whom appropriate treatment was initiated, three died (in two patients, the infection focus could not be removed and one had disseminated infection).

Discussion

RYOC causes fungemia or disseminated infection mostly in patients with immunosuppressed status and those with risk factors. Therefore, determining the clinical features of patients and the local antifungal MIC values of RYOC strains will be helpful in patient treatment and management.

In the related literature, the incidence of RYOC-related fungemia differs between countries and centers. While this rate was 0.7% in a nationwide 8-year-surveillance report in Denmark, it was 1.8% in a multicenter study conducted in Spain[2, 12]. In a study involving patients with cancer in the USA, this rate was determined as 2.1 cases per 100,000 patient days[13]. While this rate was 2.2% in a single-center study conducted in our country[14], a higher incidence rate (8.1%) was reported in a multicenter study from Asia[8]. In our study, the incidence of RYOC was 4,9%, similar to another study conducted in our country. Considering the predisposing factors, number of patients, and geographical conditions in various patient groups, different rates between centers are expected. In our study, the mortality rate of RYOC-related fungemia was 53%, which was consistent with recent reports. Yamamoto et al.[9] analyzed hospitalized adults and reported mortality rate of non-Candida fungemia of 54% (n=11), and Alp et al.[14] reported 47% (n=19). The duration of fungemia development after hospitalization was 16 days, and this period vary between 18 and 47 days in the literature[9, 14]. The development time of fungemia was short in our center because of frequent hospitalizations due to chemotherapy protocols or comorbidity, as in 17 patients followed up with malignancies. Furthermore, eight of the 15 patients admitted in the ICU were transferred from an external center, making it difficult to make an objective assessment.

In accordance with population-based studies conducted in Denmark and France, the rare yeasts Trichosporon spp. and Saprochaete clavata were most commonly isolated at our center[2, 6]. Moreover, the third most common pathogen isolated in our study was Saccharomyces spp., which was reported as the dominant species in the ARTEMIS study[15].

In recent years, S. clavata has attracted attention because of its increasing reports in patients with immunosuppressed status. It causes disseminated infection and is mostly reported in Mediterranean countries[16-19]. This fungus, which is resistant to echinocandins in vitro, has been reported in a case series of patients followed up with hematological malignancy[16, 19, 20]. Except one, all our patients with fungemia due to S. clavata had hematological malignancy. The antifungal susceptibility results of nine S. clavata isolates revealed low MICs for AMB and VRC, whereas FLC and echinocandin ​​had high MIC values (Table 4). This microorganism, as reported in the literature, caused a breakthrough infection in five patients with hematological malignancies who received echinocandin therapy, and all patients died[21]. In our center, according to the guideline recommendations, L-AmB (AII) or CAS (AII) was preferred as empirical treatment in patients with hematological malignancies and fever under neutropenia[6]. Despite the revision of antifungal therapy to VRC and/or L-AmB initially or soon after having the identification and/or susceptibility test results, all patients with hematological malignancies died.

Biochemical tests often misidentify S. clavata as S. capitata. However, recent advances in pathogen analysis with MALDI-TOF have resulted in a high level of discrimination. S. clavata was detected in nine patients, and eight of these strains were identified in a previous study conducted in our hospital, consistent with nucleotide sequencing analysis with the MALDI-TOF MS biotyper 3.1 database[17]. In another study, patients with S. capitata fungemia were evaluated, and nine of 18 patients were successfully treated with L-AmB and VRC[3]. Although the MIC values ​​reported in that study were similar to our values, the difference in mortality rates was thought to be related to the use of echinocandin in empirical treatment in our hospital. Moreover, Saprochaete spp. can cause disseminated infections with involvement of multiple organs such as the liver, spleen, lymph node, and bone marrow, leading to treatment failure and prolonged fungemia[20, 21]. S. clavata was isolated in the tissue biopsy culture taken from the oral mucosa in one patient, and most of the patients with clinically unstable status could not be examined for visceral involvement. Thus, examination for systemic involvement is necessary in the management of patients with S. clavata fungemia.

Rhodotorula spp. can cause breakthrough infections even under CAS therapy[22]. Since Rhodotorula spp. is resistant to azole and echinocandin in vitro, AMB (AII) and flucytosine (AII) are recommended as first-line therapy[7]. In our case, when yeast was detected in the blood culture under FLC therapy, the treatment was revised to CAS. Considering the susceptibility test results (MIC=0.5 µg/ml), treatment was continued, and clinical and laboratory improvement was observed.

Azole MIC values ​​were low for T. asahii and T. coremiiforme (Table 2). Two of the patients with Trichosporon spp. fungemia were treated with FLC (MIC=2 µg/ml) or VRC (MIC=1 µg/ml) with source control. Since Trichosporon spp. is resistant to AMB in vitro, VRC (BIII) is recommended as the first-line treatment in guidelines, and a study showed that FLC (CIII) can be used in the treatment[7]. In a study that reported successful treatment of Trichosporon spp. with VRC, higher MIC values ​​were found for AMB, which is similar to our findings[2]. In a review, treatment failure was more common in patients on L-AmB, and significantly positive results were observed in patients who received a combination of VRC and/or L-AmB[23].

Study Limitations

The main limitation of this study is the small sample size owing to the low incidence and retrospective design. A comparison in treatment management could not be made because of the small number of patients and heterogeneity of the groups.

Conclusion

Guidelines recommend specific antifungal therapies for specific RYOC treatment; however, the management of many rare yeast infections requires an individualized approach. Further studies on the early detection and antifungal susceptibility patterns of RYOC will guide clinicians in the treatment of these yeasts.

Ethics

Ethics Committee Approval: The study protocol was approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Karadeniz Technical University on April 29, 2022 (no: 2022-73), and study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Informed Consent: retrospective study.

Peer-review: Externally and internally peer-reviewed.

Authorship Contributions

Surgical and Medical Practices: İ.T., E.Ö., Concept: F.A., Design: F.A., Data Collection or Processing: D.T., G.Y., Analysis or Interpretation: D.T., G.Y., İ.T., E.Ö., Literature Search: D.T., S.K., Writing: D.T., F.A., G.Y.

Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.

Financial Disclosure: The authors declared that this study received no financial support.

References

1
Miceli MH, Díaz JA, Lee SA. Emerging opportunistic yeast infections. Lancet Infect Dis. 2011;11:142-51.
2
Fernández-Ruiz M, Guinea J, Puig-Asensio M, Zaragoza Ó, Almirante B, Cuenca-Estrella M, Aguado JM; CANDIPOP Project; GEIH-GEMICOMED (SEIMC) and REIPI. Fungemia due to rare opportunistic yeasts: data from a population-based surveillance in Spain. Med Mycol. 2017;55:125-36.
3
Ulu-Kilic A, Atalay MA, Metan G, Cevahir F, Koç N, Eser B, Çetin M, Kaynar L, Alp E. Saprochaete capitata as an emerging fungus among patients with haematological malignencies. Mycoses. 2015;58:491-7.
4
Anatoliotaki M, Mantadakis E, Galanakis E, Samonis G. Rhodotorula species fungemia: a threat to the immunocompromised host. Clin Lab. 2003;49:49-55.
5
Pappas PG, Kauffman CA, Andes DR, Clancy CJ, Marr KA, Ostrosky-Zeichner L, Reboli AC, Schuster MG, Vazquez JA, Walsh TJ, Zaoutis TE, Sobel JD. Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Candidiasis: 2016 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;62:e1-50.
6
Tissot F, Agrawal S, Pagano L, Petrikkos G, Groll AH, Skiada A, Lass-Flörl C, Calandra T, Viscoli C, Herbrecht R. ECIL-6 guidelines for the treatment of invasive candidiasis, aspergillosis and mucormycosis in leukemia and hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients. Haematologica. 2017;102:433-44.
7
Arendrup MC, Boekhout T, Akova M, Meis JF, Cornely OA, Lortholary O; European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Fungal Infection Study Group; European Confederation of Medical Mycology. ESCMID and ECMM joint clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and management of rare invasive yeast infections. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014;20(Suppl)3:76-98.
8
Lin SY, Lu PL, Tan BH, Chakrabarti A, Wu UI, Yang JH, Patel AK, Li RY, Watcharananan SP, Liu Z, Chindamporn A, Tan AL, Sun PL, Hsu LY, Chen YC; Asia Fungal Working Group (AFWG). The epidemiology of non-Candida yeast isolated from blood: The Asia Surveillance Study. Mycoses. 2019;62:112-20.
9
Yamamoto M, Takakura S, Hotta G, Matsumura Y, Matsushima A, Nagao M, Ito Y, Ichiyama S. Clinical characteristics and risk factors of non-Candida fungaemia. BMC Infect Dis. 2013;13:247.
10
Kidd SE, Abdolrasouli A, Hagen F. Fungal Nomenclature: Managing Change is the Name of the Game. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2023;10:ofac559.
11
Barbara D, Alexander MD. M27/Reference Method for Broth Dilution Antifungal-Susceptibility Testing of Yeasts, 4th Edition. Available from: https://clsi.org/standards/products/microbiology/documents/m27/
12
Arendrup MC, Dzajic E, Jensen RH, Johansen HK, Kjaeldgaard P, Knudsen JD, Kristensen L, Leitz C, Lemming LE, Nielsen L, Olesen B, Rosenvinge FS, Røder BL, Schønheyder HC. Epidemiological changes with potential implication for antifungal prescription recommendations for fungaemia: data from a nationwide fungaemia surveillance programme. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013;19:E343-53.
13
Chitasombat MN, Kofteridis DP, Jiang Y, Tarrand J, Lewis RE, Kontoyiannis DP. Rare opportunistic (non-Candida, non-Cryptococcus) yeast bloodstream infections in patients with cancer. J Infect. 2012;64:68-75.
14
Alp S, Gulmez D, Ayaz CM, Arikan-Akdagli S, Akova M. Fungaemia due to rare yeasts in a tertiary care university centre within 18 years. Mycoses. 2020;63:488-93.
15
Pfaller MA, Diekema DJ, Gibbs DL, Newell VA, Bijie H, Dzierzanowska D, Klimko NN, Letscher-Bru V, Lisalova M, Muehlethaler K, Rennison C, Zaidi M; Global Antifungal Surveillance Group. Results from the ARTEMIS DISK Global Antifungal Surveillance Study, 1997 to 2007: 10.5-year analysis of susceptibilities of noncandidal yeast species to fluconazole and voriconazole determined by CLSI standardized disk diffusion testing. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47:117-23.
16
Kangül H, Özcan N, Uzuner N, Mete M, Mert Erginer U. Saprochaete clavata (Geotrichum clavatum) septicemia in a patient with multiple myeloma; An emerging case from Southeastern Turkey. Curr Med Mycol. 2020;6:66-9.
17
Özkaya E, Tosun İ, Tüfekçİ EF, Buruk CK, Kaklıkkaya N, Aydın F. Identification and antifungal susceptibility of Saprochaete clavata from invasive infections in Turkey. Acta Microbiol Immunol Hung. 2020;67:252-7.
18
Pavone P, Oliva A, Raponi G, Pugliese F, Martelli S, Celli P, Sacco F, Vullo V, Mastroianni CM, Russo G. Disseminated fungal infection due to Saprochaete clavata in a kidney transplant recipient. J Mycol Med. 2019;29:278-81.
19
Del Principe MI, Sarmati L, Cefalo M, Fontana C, De Santis G, Buccisano F, Maurillo L, De Bellis E, Postorino M, Sconocchia G, Del Poeta G, Sanguinetti M, Amadori S, Pagano L, Venditti A. A cluster of Geotrichum clavatum (Saprochaete clavata) infection in haematological patients: a first Italian report and review of literature. Mycoses. 2016;59:594-601.
20
Pemmaraju N, Shetty AV, Prieto VG, Jain N, Kontoyiannis DP, Borthakur G. Disseminated Saprochaete capitata (formerly known as Geotrichum capitatum and Blastoschizomyces capitatus) in a patient with acute myeloid leukemia. Eur J Haematol. 2014;93:543-4.
21
Schuermans C, van Bergen M, Coorevits L, Verhaegen J, Lagrou K, Surmont I, Jeurissen A. Breakthrough Saprochaete capitata infections in patients receiving echinocandins: case report and review of the literature. Med Mycol. 2011;49:414-8.
22
Diekema DJ, Petroelje B, Messer SA, Hollis RJ, Pfaller MA. Activities of available and investigational antifungal agents against rhodotorula species. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43:476-8.
23
Liao Y, Lu X, Yang S, Luo Y, Chen Q, Yang R. Epidemiology and Outcome of Trichosporon Fungemia: A Review of 185 Reported Cases From 1975 to 2014. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2015;2:ofv141