EN | TR
E-ISSN: 2147-673X
Comparison of Definitions of Multiple Drug Resistance to Antibiotics and Its Alternative Multiple Antibiotic Resistance and Their Methodological Critical Analysis
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
RESEARCH ARTICLE
VOLUME: 8 ISSUE: 1
P: 34-34
January 2019

Comparison of Definitions of Multiple Drug Resistance to Antibiotics and Its Alternative Multiple Antibiotic Resistance and Their Methodological Critical Analysis

Mediterr J Infect Microb Antimicrob 2019;8(1):34-34
DOI: 10.4274/mjima.galenos.2019.2019.34
Nermin SAVAŞAN 1
Nedim ÇAKIR 2
Leyla AKARTAŞ 1
1. Near East University Medical Sciences Institute, Department of Clinical Microbiology, Nicosia, Cyprus
2. Near East University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Nicosia, Cyprus
No information available.
No information available
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

Summary

Introduction: Multiple resistance to antibiotics is a problem in modern medicine and acceptable definitions are needed to describe it. The widely accepted method for this purpose is the Multiple Drug Resistance (MDR) definition and the older but less used Multiple Antibiotic Resistance (MAR) indexing system. The aim of this study was to analyze their ability for comparing multiple resistance results for the same Enterobacteriaceae members obtained using these two methods and to investigate whether there is a need to improve these definitions.
Materials and Methods: Antimicrobial resistance test results of 665 Escherichia coli and 292 Klebsiella spp. strains isolated in the Clinical Microbiology Laboratory of our hospital were evaluated retrospectively. Resistance results were grouped under antibiotic categories and classified as multiple, extensively, and pan-drug resistance groups according to the MDR definition. MAR indices were determined by dividing the number of resistant antibiotics in both microorganism isolates separately and collectively by the number of antibiotics for which susceptibility was tested. The results were divided into subgroups according to the origin of the patients and the clinical samples obtained and were evaluated according to their total results. Than the two resistance classification methods were compared.
Results: Among the E. coli and Klebsiella spp. strains analyzed in this study, 45.86% and 40.06% of the strains were classified as multidrug-resistant according to the MDR definition, respectively. However, when these strains were evaluated with the MAR index method, it was found that the resistance rates were (from most to least resistant) 1.65%, 6.46%, 10.97%, 7.36%, 6.61%, and 11.12% in E. coli and 5.13%, 7.87%, 8.56%, 3.79%, 4.10%, and 8.21% percent in Klebsiella spp. Similar results were observed in subgroup analysis.
Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that the MAR index method, which is used less frequently in medical research, yields more detailed results than the commonly used MDR method and provides more objective outcomes since it expresses resistance results numerically.

Keywords:
Extensively drug-resistant, XDR, pandrug-resistant, PDR, microbial task performance and analysis

References

1
Karam G, Chastre J, Wilcox MH, Vincent JL. Antibiotic strategies in the era of multidrug resistance. Crit Care. 2016;22;20:136.
2
Thaden JT, Li Y, Ruffin F, Maskarinec SA, Hill-Rorie JM, Wanda LC, Reed SD, Fowler VG Jr. Increased Costs Associated with Bloodstream Infections Caused by Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria Are Due Primarily to Patients with Hospital-Acquired Infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017;61:1709-16.
3
World Health Organization Factsheet of antibiotic resistances. The last accessed date: 05.02.2018. Available from: https://www.who.int/newsroom/ factsheets/detail/antibiotic-resistance
4
World Health Organization Global Action plan (Together with FAO and OIE) The last accessed date: 2017.11.03. Available from: https://www.who. int/antimicrobialresistance/global-action-plan/UpdatedRoadmap-Global- Framework-for-DevelopmentStewardship-to-combatAMR_2017_11_03
5
Alekshun MN, Levy SB. Molecular Mechanisms of Antibacterial Multidrug Resistance. Cell. 2007;128:1037-50.
6
Rubens CE, McNeill WF, Farrar WE Jr. Evolution of multiple-antibioticresistance plasmids mediated by transposable plasmid deoxyribonucleic acid sequences. J Bacteriol. 1979;140:713-9.
7
Bottery MJ, Wood AJ, Brockhurst MA. Selective Conditions for a Multiple Drug Resistance Plasmid Depend on the Sociality of Antibiotic Resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016;60:2524-7.
8
Poole K. Efflux-mediated antimicrobial resistance. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2005;56:20-51. Mediterr J Infect Microb Antimicrob 2019;8:34 Savaşan et al. Critical Analysis of the Multiple Drug Resistance
9
Cerceo E, Deitelzweig SB, Sherman BM, Amin AN. Multidrug-Resistant Gram Negative Bacterial Implications for Clinical Practice, and Emerging Treatment Options. Microb Drug Resist. 2016;22:412-31.
10
Magiorakos AP, Srinivasan A, Carey RB, Carmeli Y, Falagas ME, Giske CG, Harbarth S, Hindler JF, Kahlmeter G, Olsson-Liljequist B, Paterson DL, Rice LB, Stelling J, Struelens MJ, Vatopoulos A, Weber JT, Monnet DL. Multidrug resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18:268-81.
11
Krumperman PH. Multiple antibiotic resistance indexing of Escherichia coli to identify high-risk sources of fecal contamination of foods. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1983;46:165-70.
12
Naik OA, Shashidhar R, Rath D, Bandekar JR, Rath A. Characterization of multiple antibiotic resistance of culturable microorganisms and metagenomic analysis of total microbial diversity of marine fish sold in retail shops in Mumbai, India. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018;25:6228-39.
13
Matuschek E, Brown DF, Kahlmeter G. Development of the EUCAST disk diffusion antimicrobial susceptibility testing method and its implementation in routine microbiology laboratories. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014;20:255-66.
14
van Duin D, Paterson DL. Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria in the Community: Trends and Lessons Learned. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2016;30:377-90.
15
Subramani S, Vignesh S. MAR Index Study and MDR Character Analysis of a few Golden Staph Isolates. Asian Journal of Pharmacy and Life Science. 2012;2:151-4.
16
Becnel Boyd L, Maynard MJ, Morgan-Linnell SK, Horton LB, Sucgang R, Hamill RJ, Jimenez JR, Versalovic J, Steffen D, Zechiedrich L. Relationships among ciprofloxacin, gatifloxacin, levofloxacin, and norfloxacin MICs for fluoroquinolone resistant Escherichia coli clinical isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009;53:229-34.
17
Shannon KP, Phillips I, King BA. Aminoglycoside resistance among Enterobacteriaceae and Acinetobacter species. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1978;4:131-42.
18
Kanazawa S, Sato T, Kohira N, Ito-Horiyama T, Tsuji M, Yamano Y. Susceptibility of Imipenem-Susceptible but Meropenem-Resistant bla(IMP-6) Carrying Enterobacteriaceae to Various Antibacterials, Including the Siderophore Cephalosporin Cefiderocol. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017;61:e00576-17.