Comparative Analysis of Filtration Ability of Different Cloth Masks
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
RESEARCH ARTICLE
P: 25-25
January 2021

Comparative Analysis of Filtration Ability of Different Cloth Masks

Mediterr J Infect Microb Antimicrob 2021;10(1):25-25
1. Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Microbiology, Ankara, Turkey
2. Gazi University Hospital, Infection Control Committee, Ankara, Turkey
3. Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
4. Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Ankara, Turkey
5. Gazi Üniversitesi Sağlık Araştırma Uygulama Merkezi Gazi Hastanesi Başhekim Yardımcısı, Ankara, Türkiye
6. Gazi University, Health Research Application Center Gazi Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
7. Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health Ankara, Turkey
No information available.
No information available
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

Summary

Introduction: The effectivity of cloth masks is one of the major concerns during pandemic. In this study, the filtration ability of different cloth masks was compared.
Materials and Methods: We examined the filtration ability of different cloth masks in “Touch Screen Aerosol Photometer” DOP3500 machine by testing 0,3-0,5 µm diameter standart “aerosol” particle at mask factory (MAKSAM) of Mechanical and Chemical Industry Company located in Ankara. In order to show the difference in filtration ability of the cloth maskes clearly, particule size was defined as 0,3-0,5 µm. Pure silk 100%, 80% silk + 20% polyester, 100% satin, 100% polyester, 100% cotton, 100% bamboo and 50% cotton + 50% polyester were compared. Cloth masks made from these materials were tested three times; before washing, after ten times washing and combined using with a medical mask.
Results: N95/FFP-2 respirator was used as a “positive control” with a filtration ability of 99.7%. Measurable filtration ability of total particle counts was 18.2% of three layered medical mask. When we tested double medical mask, reduction of total particle counts reached to 31.6%. According to our result, we conclude that wearing double medical mask is more protective than wearing a single medical mask. Measureable reduction of total particle counts were different for all tested cloth masks. Cloth masks were tested second time after 10 times washing. Un-washed cloth mask made from 80% silk + 20% polyester was found to be protective, however after ten times washing particle counts of the same mask reduced markedly. Measurable reduction of total particle counts were also reduced after ten times washing of cloth masks made from 100% satin and 100% polyester. The most efficient cloth mask for blocking particules was 100% cotton after ten times washing.
Conclusion: Our study offers evidence in favor of synthetic and polyester materials are not suitable for cloth masks since their filtration ability is reduced after multiple washing. Instead, use of cotton masks is more preventive than the others because of its increased filtration ability after washing. Combined wearing of medical mask and cloth mask together resulted in increased efficacy of filtration ability of both masks. We conclude that, wearing double mask is more effective than wearing a single mask when we consider the actual status of the pandemic with widespread distribution of mutant viruses and the high number of infected individuals in the public.

References

1Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Coronavirus disease (COVID-19): infection control guidance. Last Accessed Date: 29.03.2021. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/
2World Health Organization (WHO). Infection prevention and control during health care when novel coronavirus (nCoV) infection is suspected. Last Accessed Date: 29.03.2021. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications-detail/infection-prevention-and-control-during-health-care-when-novel-coronavirus-(ncov)-infection-is-suspected
3Kalkancı A, Baş S, Bostan B, Bay F, Metin Ü, Özden G, Güzel Tunçcan Ö, Özger S, Dizbay M. COVID-19 pandemi döneminde sağlık çalışanlarında kişisel koruyucu ekipman yönetimi: Gazi Üniversitesi Hastanesi Enfeksiyon Kontrol Komitesi uygulamaları. Gazi Med J 2020;31:309-15.
4Kırman C. Yüz maskeleri, TMMOB Tekstil Mühendisleri Odası, Covid 19 Krizi Dönemi, Genel Bilgilendirme, Nisan 2020. Son Erişim Tarihi: 29.03.2021. Erişim Adresi: https://www.tmo.org.tr/images/editorimages/Y%C3%9CZ%20MASKELER%C4%B0%20GENEL%20B%C4%B0LG%C4%B0LEND%C4%B0RME.pdf
5Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Use masks to slow the spread of COVID-19. Last Accessed Date: 29.03.2021. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/prevent-getting-sick/diy-cloth-face-coverings.html
6World Health Organization (WHO). Mask use in the context of COVID-19 Last Accessed Date: 12.04.2021. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/advice-on-the-use-of-masks-in-the-community-during-home-care-and-in-healthcare-settings-in-the-context-of-the-novel-coronavirus-(2019-ncov)-outbreak
7T.C. Sanayi ve Teknoloji Bakanlığı Türk Standartları Enstitüsü: Tekstilden mamul tekrar kullanılabilir koruyucu yüz maskeleri - Tıbbi olmayan. TSE K 599. Son Erişim Tarihi: 29.03.2021. Erişim Adresi: https://statik.tse.org.tr/upload//tr/dosya/duyuruyonetimi/5919/11052020192406-2.pdf
8Darby S, Chulliyallipalil K, Przyjalgowski M, McGowan P, Jeffers S, Giltinan A, Lewis L, Smith N, Sleator RD. COVID-19: mask efficacy is dependent on both fabric and fit. Future Microbiol. 2021;16:5-11.
9Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Improve how your mask protects you. Last Accessed Date:29.03.2021. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/your-health/effective-masks.html
10Howard J, Huang A, Li Z, Tufekci Z, Zdimal V, van der Westhuizen HM, von Delft A, Price A, Fridman L, Tang LH, Tang V, Watson GL, Bax CE, Shaikh R, Questier F, Hernandez D, Chu LF, Ramirez CM, Rimoin AW. An evidence review of face masks against COVID-19. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021;118:e2014564118.
11Cheng VC, Wong SC, Chuang VW, So SY, Chen JH, Sridhar S, To KK, Chan JF, Hung IF, Ho PL, Yuen KY. The role of community-wide wearing of face mask for control of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic due to SARS-CoV-2. J Infect. 2020;81:107-14.
12Chughtai AA, Seale H, Macintyre CR. Effectiveness of cloth masks for protection against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020;26:e200948.
13Rengasamy S, Eimer B, Shaffer RE. Simple respiratory protection-evaluation of the filtration performance of cloth masks and common fabric materials against 20-1000 nm size particles. Ann Occup Hyg. 2010;54:789-98.
14Ho KF, Lin LY, Weng SP, Chuang KJ. Medical mask versus cotton mask for preventing respiratory droplet transmission in micro environments. Sci Total Environ. 2020;735:139510.
15Fischer EP, Fischer MC, Grass D, Henrion I, Warren WS, Westman E. Low-cost measurement of face mask efficacy for filtering expelled droplets during speech. Sci Adv. 2020;6:eabd3083.
16Swain ID. Why the mask? The effectiveness of face masks in preventing the spread of respiratory infections such as COVID-19 - a home testing protocol. J Med Eng Technol. 2020;44:334-7.
17Furuhashi M. A study on the microbial filtration efficiency of surgical face masks--with special reference to the non-woven fabric mask. Bull Tokyo Med Dent Univ. 1978;25:7-15.
18Douglas JDM, McLean N, Horsley C, Higgins G, Douglas CM, Robertson E. COVID-19: smoke testing of surgical mask and respirators. Occup Med (Lond). 2020;70:556-63.
19T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı, COVID-19 Salgın Yönetimi ve Çalışma Rehberi, Bilimsel Danışma Kurulu Çalışması, 1 Ekim 2020. Son Erişim Tarihi: 29.03.2021. Erişim Adresi: https://covid19.saglik.gov.tr/Eklenti/40340/0/covid-19salginyonetimivecalismarehberipdf.pdf
20Hill WC, Hull MS, MacCuspie RI. Testing of commercial masks and respirators and cotton mask insert materials using SARS-CoV-2 virion-sized particulates: Comparison of ideal aerosol filtration efficiency versus fitted filtration efficiency. Nano Lett. 2020;20:7642-7.
21Zangmeister CD, Radney JG, Vicenzi EP, Weaver JL. Filtration efficiencies of nanoscale aerosol by cloth mask materials used to slow the spread of SARS-CoV-2. ACS Nano. 2020;14:9188-200.
22Beesoon S, Behary N, Perwuelz A. Universal masking during COVID-19 pandemic: Can textile engineering help public health? Narrative review of the evidence. Prev Med 2020;139:106236.
23World Health Organization. Advice on the use of masks in the community setting in influenza A (H1N1) outbreaks. Last Accessed Date: 29.03.2021. Available from: http://www.who.int/csr/resources/publications/swineflu/masks_community/en/index.html
Article is only available in PDF format. Show PDF
2024 ©️ Galenos Publishing House